CONFLICT IMPACT ASSESSMENT BETWEEN OBJECTS IN A BIM SYSTEM

ISARC

Yi-Chun Lin1, Shin-Hsun Chou1 and *I-Chen Wu1

1Department of Civil Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences

415 Chien Kung Road

Kaohsiung, Taiwan

(*Corresponding author: kwu@kuas.edu.tw)

Mechanical/Electrical/Piping (MEP) systems, due to their complexity and diversity, are the most intricate part of building construction. This being the case, Combined Services Drawings (CSD) and Structure, Electric and Mechanic(SEM) drawings can ensure that all coordination issues are resolved prior to construction. Construction companies attempt to apply Building Information Modeling (BIM) to manage and integrate engineering information and solutions efficiently into the CSD and SEM processes to enhance the accuracy of design and the efficiency of review. There are several powerful commercial tools, such as Bentley Navigator, Autodesk Navisworks, and Tekla BIMsight, that can review the integrated BIM model and detect conflicts in systems, and allow planners to correct the conflict issues one at a time. However, for increasing numbers of conflicts, this may be inefficient, and requires them to be arranged in a list according to impact and seriousness before solving them. For this reason, this research implements a module for conflict impact assessment based on rule-based reasoning to classify and weigh conflict impact and seriousness, and highlight the conflicted objects in the BIM system in different colors depending on their conflict type and seriousness during the analysis. This system not only detects and lists possible conflicts and errors, but also sorts them according to the severity of impact and conflict type. Planners can effectively modify the BIM models according to these conflicts as they are listed and visualized in the BIM system. If these conflicts, such as pipeline interference and problems of insufficient space, can be avoided in the early stages of planning, it facilitates the achievement of project objectives in quality, scheduling, and cost.
Keywords: Design; Systems; Impact; Impacts; Pipeline; Pipelines; Construction; analysis;
Full Access to Technical Paper
PDF version for $20.00
Other papers from ISARC